|
Crime and Punishment

The following crimes are punishable by a fine: exposed or drawn weapons
in public (1st offense), public intoxication, public display of hunting
trophies, child abuse (1st offense), failure to be a helpful
citizen/good Samaritan, any excessive lewd or bawdy behavior, militia’s
discretion.
The following crimes are punishable by jail time: theft, arson,
poaching, disrespect to authority, failure to obey militia, morally
derelict behaviors and attitudes, unlicensed sale of drugs and
paraphernalia, unlicensed sale of weapons and armor, militia’s
discretion.
The following crimes are punishable by execution and/or banishment:
rape, murder, deforestation, disrespect to the Goddess and Emperor,
treason, use of poisons and toxins, human heritage, use of dark
magic, Emperor's discretion.
Any and all crime can be appealed to the proper authority, the
Emperor's/Empress' word is the final word in all matters of crime and
punishment, but social pressure by traditionalists has been known to
sway this, sometimes drastically.
*THE HONOR CHALLENGE
An ancient tradition that is still legal on the books but avoided
because of social pressure is that of a challenge over Honor. If it is
deemed that someone has slurred the name of a citizen, their family or
their lifestyle, it is legally their right to challenge the offending
person to a battle for their honor. This duel is typically to the death,
but some form of maiming or simple beating, depending on the severity of
the insult and status of the offender, is considered legally and
socially acceptable. An proper overseer must be present, a noble of
unrelated status to either side, and all all rules of mating challenges
are in effect, save the absolute imperativeness of death of one or the
other: challenger/challenged.
Towskish Substantive Criminal Law

To begin, every crime consists of proving each and every element of the
crime as stated in procedural law and substantive law.
Substantive:
"The guilty mind": When a certain intent is a necessary element in a
crime, the crime cannot have been committed when the intent did not
exist. If the criminal mind was not present, and is necessary for the
burden of proof, and if the suspected indulged in no such conduct, the
crime cannot have been committed.
"Specific Intent" or "General Intent": The crime for which the suspect
is accused, must carry with it proof of a specific intent. This means
that the prosecution must prove that no only did the suspect -do-
certain acts, but that they did the acts with the intent to cause a
particular result. General intent is a lesser form of intent requiring
only that the suspect's act itself is expressive of a culpable state of
mind. It is when someone acts, without compulsion, committing a crime
that is not based on negligence, and does not require any particular
form of specific intent.
"Overt Act": Some type of overt act must be committed toward the
perpetration of a crime. A plan or scheme to commit a crime, without
more, is not a crime (unless directed toward a noble body). Some overt
act must have taken place to commit the crime.
"Strict Legal Responsibility": Crimes that are punishable merely by
doing a particular act.
"Gross Negligence Responsibility": Willfully disregarding the results to
others that might follow from an act or failure to act. In order to find
the suspect was grossly negligent, you must find each of the following
three things:
1. That the suspect knew of the danger another , that is they knew
there was a situation that required them to take ordinary care to avoid
injuring another, or allowing further injury done.
2. The suspect could have avoided injuring another by using
ordinary care.
3. The suspect failed to use ordinary care to prevent inuring
another when, to a reasonable person, it must have been apparent that
the result was likely to be serious injury.
Types of Crimes

"Offensive Felony": Shall be construed to mean any offense for which the
offender, on conviction may be punished by death, or by imprisonment in
state prison.
"Misconduct": Any act or commission, not an offensive felony, is
punishable according to law, by a fine, penalty or forfeiture, and
imprisonment, or by such fine, penalty or forfeiture, or imprisonment ,
in the discretion of the Empire shall be considered misconduct.
"Effort": Attempted Crime. Any person who shall attempt to commit an
offense prohibited by the law or do any act toward the commission of
such offense, but shall fail in the perpetration, or shall be
intercepted or prevented in the execution of the same, when no express
provision is made by law for the punishment of such attempt, shall be
punished as follows:
1. If the offense attempted to be committed is such as is
punishable with death, the person may be convicted and be guilty of an
offensive felony. Punishable by death or life in prison as deemed
appropriate by the Empire.
2. If the offense so attempted is punishable by imprisonment in
prison for life, or for five years or more, shall be guilty of an
offensive felony and punished in prison by a term of not more than five
years or not less than one year.
3. If the offense attempted to be committed is punishable by
imprisonment in prison for a term of less than five years, they will be
found guilty of misconduct and imprisoned for no more than one year or
may not exceed 1,000 evar; but in no case shall the imprisonment exceed
1/2 of the greatest punishment which might have been inflicted if the
offense so attempted had been committed.
"Conspiracy": Any person who conspires together with one or more persons
to commit an offense prohibited by law, or to commit a legal acting an
illegal manner is guilty of the crime of conspiracy and shall be
punished as such:
1. Crimes against nobility and the Empire: Death.
2. Crimes against the common man: Possible death, imprisonment, or
punishment not to exceed 10,000 evar.
"Aiding and Abetting": Any person concerned in the commission of an
offense, whether they directly commit the act constituting offense, or
procures, counsels, aids, ore abets in its commission may hereafter be
prosecuted, indicated, tried and convicted and shall be punished if they
had directly committed such offense.
1. Before the fact: Offensive Felony Aiding and Abetting. Shall be
tried for the crime, aid to criminals as a second crime to study for
conviction, up to life imprisonment.
2. After the fact: Misdemeanor Aiding and Abetting. Shall be tried
for aiding and/or abetting, and punished by up to one year in prison,
and not in excess of not more than 1,000 evar.
Defenses-Procedural Law

Entrapment
Perfect Defense (meaning that all charges must be immediately dismissed)
that alleges that except for the conduct of governmental agents, the
defendant would not have committed the crime charged.
Capacity
Capacity is defined as the mental ability of the defendant to form the
intent of the crime. Capacity involve the defendant not being able to
perfect the necessary state of mind to prove an element (-intent-) of
the offense. This is often found with specific intent crimes. This could
involve the following (affirmative defenses mean that you are admitting
to the acts of the crime. not the intent, all of these are affirmative
defenses):
Insanity-the quality of the act and knowing whether it was right or
wrong. If found Insane, the suspect would be placed in the care of the
Nicolo family, who has developed a work program to keep people in line
as well as productive, and while there, are seen regularly by shamans to
preserve a more calm mental strength.
Legal Insanity-an defense to a prosecution that the suspect was legally
inane when committing the acts constituting the offense. If legally
insane, the suspect is treated as one who has plead insanity and is
released from the farms only if they are deemed mentally healthy by the
Nicolo family. However, they may never have to spend time on probation
or in a treatment facility if they are considered, now, legally sane.
Guilty but Mentally Ill-All of the following must be present:
-Defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of an offense.
-It has been proven by a preponderance (around 51% sure) of the evidence
that he or she was mentally ill at the time of the commission of that
offense.
-Suspect has not established by a preponderance of the evidence that
they lacked the substantial capacity either to appreciate the nature and
quality or the wrongfulness of his or her conduct or to conform to the
requirements of the law.
The defense of insanity is complete when the suspect waives their right
to trial, by jury or by Prosecuting Inquisitor, may accept a plea of
guilty or a plea or a plea of no contest. The Emperor shall not accept
the pleas without the suspect's consent, has examined the reports
prepared in totality by both prosecuting and defending Inquisitorial
parties, and makes a determination based on those reports and a
preponderance of the evidence for insanity.
The court shall then set sentence, ordering terms usually prescribed by
a Nicolo shaman. The Empire may, however, decide that they wish to send
a message to the people and declare a completely different and
elementary sentence based on their own conclusions, decisions, and
morality.
If found guilty but mentally ill, and is placed on probation, they will,
by way of the prosecuting attorney, be placed in a treatment program run
by the Nicolo family, on an outpatient basis, and will be placed with a
Militia's Royal Mages Guild officer for the term of their probation for
supervision. That officer will make reports to the Inquisitorial
Prosecutor for follow-up.
Alibi: A perfect defense. The suspect was elsewhere at the time the
crime was committed.
Duress: An affirmative defense. Applicable when an act created where the
crime committed avoids a greater harm. Murder is not
defensible by duress.
Abandonment: When a conspirator abandons a conspiracy against the
Empire, Nobility, business, or common man, they must do something to let
his co-conspirators know that they are abandoning the conspiracy,
voluntarily, and must do something to be sure that the conspiracy is
stopped for intrinsic reasons.
Legal and Factual Impossibility: Impossibility occurs when, because of
the defendant's mistake of fact or law, his or her actions could not
possibly have resulted in the commission of the substantive charge
underlying and attempt charge. Legal is a defense to an impossibility of
a charge of attempt. Factual is a defense to an impossibility to a
charge because the act was never consummated through circumstances
beyond the suspect's control.
Self Defense: The defendant does not really have to prove that they
acted in self-defense. Instead, the Inquisitorial Prosecutor must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that the suspect did not act in self-defense.
USE OF DEADLY FORCE:

1. When in fear for own life or life of another.
2. When in fear of great bodily harm to self or another.
3. During "hot pursuit" by the Militia or Militia's Royal Mages Guild.
When in defense of others, if fear of great bodily harm or death is not
part of the picture, then force reasonable and
equal to that of the attacked is justified and considered self-defense.
-An elf has NO duty to retreat when attacked or when defending others or
their property.
CRIMES

Crimes Against Persons
When there is a question of whether a crime will be charged as a
Offensive Felony, Misconduct, or Attempt, the Inquisitorial Prosecutor
will decide.
Assault: An attempt to offer with force and violence, to do bodily
injury to another, by force, or force unlawfully directed toward the
person of another. MISCONDUCT OR ATTEMPT
Battery: A willful touching of the person of another by the aggressor or
by some substance put in motion by them, and is the consummation of
assault. MISCONDUCT OR ATTEMPT
Domestic Assault: MISCONDUCT
Assault with great bodily harm: OFFENSIVE FELONY
Assault or Battery of the Emperor, Empress, Government Official, or
Noble (in any capacity, not in Challenge): OFFENSIVE FELONY
Assault with intent to murder: OFFENSIVE FELONY
Mayhem: Any person who, with malicious intent to maim or disfigure,
shall cut out or maim the tongue, put out or destroy an eye, cut or tear
off an ear, cut or slit or mutilate the nose or lip, or cut off or
disable a limb, organ, or member, of any person and every person privy
to such intent who shall be present, aiding in the commission of such
offense, shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by death, imprisonment,
or by a fine of not more than 50,000 evar, depending on the severity.
ATTEMPT, MISCONDUCT, or OFFENSIVE FELONY (as deemed by the Prosecuting
Inquisitor).
Assault, Battery, Domestic Assault, Intent to Murder, and Mayhem against
a pregnant female elf: OFFENSIVE FELONY
Children:
Exposing children with intent to abandon or injure. MISCONDUCT or
OFFENSIVE FELONY
Child Abuse: MISCONDUCT or OFFENSIVE FELONY
Good Samaritan: While an elf has no legal responsibility to help another
in trouble, if they see an elf in trouble, they do have a responsibility
to go immediately to any militia member to report the incident.
MISCONDUCT
Interference in Child Custody: MISCONDUCT
Solicitation for sex: MISCONDUCT (lesser)
Solicitation for murder or any other offensive felony: OFFENSIVE FELONY
Rape: OFFENSIVE FELONY or MISCONDUCT
Rape1: Penetration + any circumstance 1-12 FELONY
Rape2: Contact + any circumstance 1-12 FELONY
Rape3: Penetration + either circumstances 13-15(any) FELONY
Rape 4: Contact + 13-15(any) FELONY
Circumstance:
1. Under 15. 11. Mentally/Physically incapacitated and related by 4th
degree.
2. 13, 14, 15 and blood affinity. 12. Mentally/Physically incapacitated
and suspect in position of authority.
3. 13. 14, 15 and same household. 13. Age 13-15
4. 13, 14, 15 and position of authority. 14. Force or coercion used.
5. Committed with another felony. 15. Victim is mentally/physically
incapacitated.
6. Multiple actors and victim in physically/mentally multiple actors and
force or coercion.
7. Incapacitated.
8. Armed or appears armed.
9. Person injury beyond rape act.
10. Injury to mental/physically incapacitated victim.
Child sexual abuse: OFFENSIVE FELONY PUNISHABLE BY DEATH ALWAYS
Homicide: Offensive Felony
Second Degree Murder (intent only to do great bodily harm): OFFENSIVE
FELONY
Voluntary Manslaughter: OFFENSIVE FELONY
Involuntary Manslaughter: MISCONDUCT OR OFFENSIVE FELONY
Assisted Suicide: Not a criminal act as of 80 A.S.
Negligent Homicide: MISCONDUCT
Kidnapping: MISCONDUCT or OFFENSIVE FELONY
Stalking: MISCONDUCT
Robbery: MISCONDUCT
Armed Robbery: OFFENSIVE FELONY
Crimes against property will be handled by the Inquisitors alone, and
any fine or jail time is applicable save death, unless the crime causes
death.
ORDER of
OPERATIONS

Simplified:
Prosecution goes first.
Offers up their opening statements. Defense may follow or may wait until
the opening of their case-in-chief.
They call their witnesses, may not lead.
Defense then crosses, may ask leading questions.
Prosecution then may redirect, still may not lead.
Defense then goes (depending on whether or not they open up the trial
with their opening statements, or wait to begin case-in-chief.)
IF not done, opens with opening statements.
May call witnesses, may not ask leading questions.
Prosecution then may cross, asking leading questions if necessary.
Defense then may redirect, still may not lead.
Closing arguments, Prosecution, then Defense.
Each get a rebuttal statement.
End trial.
There are variations.
Obviously this is a 'bench trial'. The defense may request a 'bench' or
'jury' trial. A 'bench' trial leaves the Magistrate in charge of the
verdict. A 'jury' trial takes a group of six members of society to
decide the fate (innocent/guilty/deadlock) of the Defendant.
Those jury trial members are decided upon in 'jury selection'. Each side
gets to dismiss up to six people of the total number WITH good cause
(explained to the Empress-Magistrate who will decide if the cause is
just), and three they may be dismissed without naming cause.
Objections:
Leading: Leading questions to the witness when not allowed.
Evidence not Entered: Evidence not confirmed as fact, delivered as
though it were. There IS an exception to this, in witnesses deemed by
the court to be "expert" witnesses.
Harassment: When one side or the other keeps at a witness and it seems
to be to the point of harassment. This is after the following-
Asked and Answered: When the witness has asked and answered a question
and the questioning party asks the same question, perhaps with very
faint revisions.
Objection for ... : Either side may object for what they feel is
something in the proceeding that is against the law or against court
conduct. They will describe to the Magistrate the reason for objection.
|